
$32 billion is what BP says it’s expected to pay for that gulf oil spill. $20 billion of that includes a fund that BP agreed to pay a while back on claims relating to the spill. $3billion is spent already on the company’s clean up process, and there are these other expected costs which may include costs of litigation and other fines under the clean water act. If $32 billion is all they are going to pay, its a bit unclear. Get this, BP said that they are going to raise this $32 billion by selling assets, more precisely about 10% of their assets. It’s still just a little piece. BP also announced it is tapping its current CEO Tony Hayward with Managing Director Robert Dudley.
What did Hayward have to say ?
Life isn’t fair

I’m sorry come again Mr. Hayward…Did you actually say life isn’t fair. What isn’t fair is what really happened in the gulf spill. What’s not fair is perhaps the actions taken by someone under your command that caused the greatest environmental disaster that our country has ever seen. What’s not fair is 20 killed workers of yours might I add. What’s not fair is 94 million to 184 million gallons of oil spewed into the ocean killing I don’t know how many other living creatures. Think again Mr. Hayward. The American people need a bit more than just “Life isn’t fair”



their first profit increase in nine quarters for economic bellwether General Electric. The financial community can afford to relax and kick their feet up, and maybe even have a latte.
Goldman Sachs is paying out a record $550 million to settle fraud allegations, admitting nothing except for incomplete disclosure. Goldman’s agreement with the U.S. securities watchdog is surprisingly a good outcome for the firm and its rivals considering the circumstances. $550 million is only a fraction of the amount investors stroked from Goldman’s market value.
Im sure, right about now you’ve heard about the new finance bill about to become law. But wait, as it turns out this bill doesnt answer some key principal questions. How much money are the banks going to hold as a saftey cushion? You can read this 2,300 page piece of legislature but you still won’t learn the answers to a lot of super-critical questions. In reality, the statute and the enactment of the statute is act 1 of this whole scene where we have the Congress beating up on the banks, and what we have now coming up with this legislature is act 2 where the details are going to be flushed out. To put it plainly and as simply as I can, this bill covers the big banks right? It covers JP Morgan, Chase, Bank of America, etc. But the bill also gives regulators the power to decide that big companies that are not banks but are really important to the economy should be subject to some of these regulations. There’s going to be this oversight counsel to deem certain entities, non-bank financial companies. As a result they would have to register with the government and be subject to new regulations. Do we know what companies this is going to apply to? NO. We don’t know who is covered by this bill. So big companies whoever you might be be prepared to get a call from the feds to announce you are being regulated now. Who knows how the FDIC will use this new authority to bail out non-financial institutions? We do know that bail out authority is unlimited. If a large systematically important company were to go bankrupt, and the feds would have to move in and take over, the stockholders of that company would most likely lose all their money. Then there are the bond holders, people that have lent money to that company, who could very likely get bailed out. This is just what drives economists crazy. So bond holders are more likely to lend to large bad run companies rather than smaller more efficient run companies, because to them it doesn’t matter. It’s like taking a high risk stock for a ride on a win-win situation horse. That’s why this is so dangerous to the economy, because if the government is saying you can lend to large bad run company, these bond holders don’t have to pay attention and in the end won’t have to pay for their bad investment decisions. The bill does not also say anything about requirements structure on liquidity vs capital of a non-financial istitution. As a result of the bill, 80-90% of what we know as the financial system is subject to huge uncertainty. And that’s not a good thing if you catch the drift. It’s probably going to take years before we all see what this finally means.
Since July of 2008, the housing market crumble started to bring the whole economy down with it. Later that year the millions of mortgage defaults had inevitably melted Wall Street down. It was scary none the less. Very few people were gonna buy a house if they saw the prices still dropping. When Congress decided to step in and help with the tax credit, the market seemed to stabilize and heal itself when the prices on starter homes rose, but it’s just not clear that those gains are sustainable. After that tax credit expired at the end of April, the market crashed again. We saw new home sales plunge 33% in May, a discouraging sign. Experts that have been tracking this cursed course of the real estate market, are stating that prices are starting to slide again in a lot of cities. Can Congress create a new round of tax credits this fall? Yes, they can do whatever they want? I think they are more keen to reduce the budged e rather than tax revenues. The bright spot in all of this… the interest rates are at rock bottom low levels just under 4.5%. You know, for a country who scored #1 in student confidence, our confidence in our economy is lacking immensely. People are just not buying. It’s a downward spiral. Let’s just hope the low interest rates and low house prices will be enough to find a new generation of buyers.
Just as predicted in one of my previous posts, the US payroll market has performed expectantly due to the fake growth from the temporary census jobs. Non-farm payrolls employment fell by 125,000 jobs in June following an upwardly revised increase of 433,000 jobs in May. The unemployment rate fell to 9.5% in June from 9.7% in May, as people gave up looking for work and left the labor force.


